|
>
Department >
Home >
Forage
Forage Extension Program
Managing Alfalfa for Optimum Hay-Stockpiling Production
in Montana
By Dennis Cash and Ray Ditterline
"...most crop management
practices for maximum alfalfa yield are appropriate
for Montana.... there are several additional
considerations for long-term stands of alfalfa
that are used in a hay-stockpile system."
|
Over 1.5 million acres of alfalfa are harvested for
hay annually in Montana. Alfalfa is grown under a wide
diversity of climatic conditions (42% irrigated vs.
58% dryland) and management schemes. Alfalfa can be
a very valuable cash hay crop with yields exceeding
7 tons per acre in irrigated short-term rotations. However,
a vast majority of Montana’s hay crop is fed on-site
with less than 10% produced as a cash crop. The predominant
use for alfalfa or alfalfa-grass mixtures for livestock
operations is for “hay-stockpiling”. This
management practice is defined as harvesting dry hay
in the summer – one cutting on dryland or two
under irrigation – and “stockpiling”
the aftermath regrowth for fall grazing.
Over the last 50 years, much advancement in haymaking
has been made, including modern machinery, irrigation
equipment, improved crop varieties and better management
techniques. These advancements are necessary for maximum
production of high-quality alfalfa hay in short-term
rotations, and are responsible for our success. However,
optimum forage management is different for long-term
production and persistence in the hay-stockpiling system
practiced by most Montana ranchers. Recent fuel price
increases are forcing producers to maintain longer stands,
use summer and fall grazing in lieu of haying, reducing
deep tillage at stand termination, and a number of other
practices commonly used for maximum alfalfa yields.
For example, alternative forage crops (primarily cereals)
and herbicides have been inserted in alfalfa rotations
using reduced tillage methods. Swath or windrow grazing
is also used as a method to reduce some haying and labor
costs. Increasing fertilizer prices are also resulting
in reduced applications and production.
In short, there are many new questions on alfalfa management
regarding the economics, sustainability, and optimum
input levels for long-term hay-stockpile production
in Montana. Many techniques for maximizing alfalfa yield
are completely appropriate for hay-stockpiling, while
others may not be. The following are some guidelines
that we have developed specifically for cow-calf and
sheep producers for “optimum” forage production
in a hay-stockpile system:
1. Clearly define your annual forage needs in terms
of pasture and hay base. Due to our climate, you will
always need a supply of hay for one to four months every
winter, depending on your location and land base. From
your current forage base, consider developing and planting
improved pastures to offset your hay needs.
2. Make a clear decision on your labor, equipment and
land availability for hay production. Many producers
in the 1990’s who “retired” from haying
to buy all of their hay were faced with extremely high
prices during the drought conditions in 2001 and 2002.
In contrast during years of hay surplus, haying expenses
are typically about half of the crop’s value.
Forward-contracting hay for a 3-year period from a neighbor
might be an option. Make a realistic plan for equipment
repairs and replacement for the hay you decide to produce.
3. Determine your goals for all new seedings of hay
or pasture. For example are new alfalfa or alfalfa-grass
stands to be maintained long-term (8 to 10 years)? Consider
using these only for hay for three or four years while
they are in top production, then use them for hay-stockpiling
or grazing in later years. Grazing – particularly
at inappropriate times – causes rapid stand decline
in alfalfa. At any point in your improved forage base,
you will have “new” highly-productive fields,
and several older stands of medium to low production.
4. When establishing new alfalfa or alfalfa-grass mixtures,
follow all of the recommended practices for top production
– this is not the stage to consider cutting corners.
When an old alfalfa stand is terminated, we recommend
rotation to an alternative crop for two years before
returning to alfalfa. Cereal forages such as hay barley
or a winter cereal (wheat, triticale) forage are very
useful to ranchers in this two year interval. This provides
an opportunity to maintain hay production while reducing
weed, rodent and pathogen pests in alfalfa, as well
as breakdown of sod residues. Soil test and apply P
and K ahead of establishing alfalfa. Plant an adapted
variety or mixture based on performance data in Montana.
Besides alfalfa, there are other adapted legumes (sainfoin,
birdsfoot trefoil) and grasses (meadow bromegrass, orchardgrass)
widely used in mixes http://animalrangeextension.montana.edu/Articles/Forage/Main-species.htm.
Use good management strategies such as weed control,
irrigation and harvest timing to develop a vigorous
productive forage stand during the establishment year.
5. After establishment, continue to follow good crop
and harvest management techniques. For grass (or predominantly
grass) stands used in hay or pasture, a major input
will be N fertilizer – apply 25 to 30 pounds of
actual N per every ton of potential yield. With increases
in fertilizer prices, we are anticipating that the use
of alfalfa and other forage legumes will increase.
6. Use appropriate harvest or grazing schedules. For
cash alfalfa hay, there is an emphasis on “early”
cutting (harvest in the bud stage) for maximum quality.
For alfalfa grown in short (3 to 4 years) rotations,
early and timely cutting is a way to maximize yield
and quality. However, most cow-calf producers do not
require a large supply of high-quality (for example
>20% CP, >150 RFV) hay. Often, it may useful to
put up some high-quality second cutting alfalfa hay
for feeding to replacement heifers or bulls. Generally,
alfalfa hay cut at the early bloom (<10%) stage has
the best combination of high yield and good quality
for livestock maintenance diets. For long-term, productive
alfalfa stands, we recommend that alfalfa is cut once
or twice prior to early August, then stockpiled until
October (http://animalrangeextension.montana.edu/Articles/Forage/hay/alfalfaharvest.htm)
Haying during this “hardening” period causes
rapid alfalfa stand decline (>20%), reduced yields
(up to 39%), and increased weed invasion.
If hay or pasture is desperately needed during the
critical period, use older fields and do not do it repeatedly
– rotate fall use among all of your pastures.
After “killing” frosts, about one fourth
of your annual alfalfa production is available for grazing
or haying (Table 1). Aside from proper timing of harvest,
continue to fertilize and irrigate for good levels of
production.
7. Consider using swath grazing rather than direct
“open” grazing for the aftermath. For crops
such as alfalfa, swathing eliminates leaf and nutrient
loss, and combined with proper stocking rates, the overall
utilization is improved (http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/pubs/mt200106.html).
8. Define the proper time and method to terminate an
old stand. Again, this differs between alfalfa grown
in s short-term cash hay vs. a stockpiling setting.
Some cash hay producers use their cost of production
figures to determine a kill point- for example when
a stand falls below 4 tons per acre, it is plowed, whether
it is 3 or 6 years old). In a hay-stockpile system,
you can use different strategies, such as managing a
4-ton stand for hay only until it reaches your pre-determined
end point, then incorporate it into your hay-stockpile
or pasture base. Under dryland, 1 to 2 tons may be your
potential, so the kill point will occur when weeds have
overtaken your pasture. Older stands are likely infested
with weeds, such as dandelion, quackgrass Canada thistle,
downy brome or others. Be diligent in your grazing and
harvests to minimize these weeds from making seed –
while you can “get by” with these in an
old pasture, they are costly to eliminate in new stands.
There are many considerations when a stand is to be
terminated. Late fall or winter deep plowing was a traditional
method of taking out an old alfalfa stand, however other
lower-cost options should be considered. For most forages,
the first cut comprises 40 to 70% of the total production,
so an opportune time to terminate a stand is after first-cut
regrowth is vigorously growing. Under irrigation, it
is possible to apply herbicide, do light tillage, and
plant a winter crop for forage – thus saving fuel,
labor and time in the rotation phase. For the two years
that cereals are grown, be sure to fertilize and control
weeds before returning to alfalfa and other perennial
crops.
In summary, most crop management practices for maximum
alfalfa yield are appropriate for Montana livestock
producers. However, there are several additional considerations
for long-term stands of alfalfa that are used in a hay-stockpile
system.
Table 1. Alfalfa at Bozeman, MT Under
"Ideal" Management for Hay-Stockpile
New stands, weeds controlled, fertilized
for 6-ton yields, adequate & timely irrigation
A. Average yields in replicated trials with
15 to 30 varieties
| |
Years |
Average Yield
tons DM/A, years 2-4
|
|
| Trial Seeded
In: |
Harvested |
Trial Average |
Yield of Best Variety |
% |
| 1984 |
1985-1987 |
4.72 |
4.91 |
Arrow |
104 |
| 1985 |
1987-1989 |
5.63 |
6.08 |
Crown |
108 |
| 1988 |
1989-1991 |
6.88 |
7.52 |
AgriMate |
109 |
| 1989 |
1990-1992 |
7.23 |
7.62 |
5262 |
105 |
| 1990 |
1991-1993 |
6.62 |
7.04 |
MultiPlier |
106 |
| 1991 |
1992-1994 |
5.99 |
6.45 |
Ultra |
108 |
| 1992 |
1993-1995 |
5.41 |
5.67 |
5246 |
105 |
| 1993 |
1994-1996 |
5.90 |
6.21 |
631 |
105 |
| 1994 |
1995-1997 |
5.44 |
5.64 |
5262 |
104 |
| 1995 |
1996-1998 |
5.46 |
5.87 |
DK 127 |
108 |
| 1996 |
1997-1999 |
6.05 |
6.36 |
Hyland |
105 |
| 1997 |
1998-2000 |
6.40 |
6.66 |
5396 |
104 |
| 1998 |
1999-2001 |
5.99 |
6.44 |
631 |
108 |
| 2000 |
2001-2003 |
5.56 |
6.00 |
Masterpiece |
108 |
| 2001 |
2002-2004 |
5.48 |
5.90 |
DK A42-15 |
108 |
| 2002 |
2003-2005 |
6.38 |
6.88 |
XTRA-3 |
108 |
| Average |
1985-2005 |
5.95 |
6.33 |
|
106 |
B. Seasonal Yield Distribution (tons DM/A) - Bozeman,
Irrigated
| |
Cut 1 |
Cut 2 |
Cut 3 |
Final cut
"Aftermath" |
Total |
| 2000 Seeded |
6/8/2001 |
7/19/2001 |
|
10/10/2001 |
|
| |
2.54 |
1.82 |
|
2.15 |
6.51 |
|
%Seasonal: |
39 |
28 |
|
33 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/24/02 |
7/24/02 |
|
10/7/02 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
1.50 |
|
1.72 |
5.80 |
| %Seasonal: |
44 |
26 |
|
30 |
100 |
| |
| 2002 Seeded |
6/5/2003 |
7/7/2003 |
8/11/2003* |
10/14/2003 |
|
| |
2.05 |
0.93 |
1.48 |
1.08 |
5.54 |
| %Seasonal: |
37 |
17 |
27 |
19 |
100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
6/17/2004 |
7/24/2004 |
|
10/14/2004 |
|
| |
2.90 |
1.84 |
|
1.81 |
6.55 |
| %Seasonal: |
44 |
28 |
|
28 |
100 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| Long-term |
|
|
|
"Aftermath" |
|
|
Average %Seasonal: |
42 |
32 |
|
26 |
|
*We recommend not cutting or grazing between Aug. 1
until "killing frost" to maximize winter survival
and aftermath.
C. Projected Alfalfa Productivity in a Hay-Stockpile
System
| Target Yield
Level |
tons DM/A through Aug. 1 |
Aftermath (26%) |
| (tons DM/A) |
(assuming 74%) |
(tons
DM/A) |
AUM/A |
| 2.0 |
1.48 |
0.52 |
1.3 |
| 2.5 |
1.85 |
0.65 |
1.6 |
| 3.0 |
2.22 |
0.78 |
2.0 |
| 3.5 |
2.59 |
0.91 |
2.3 |
| 4.0 |
2.96 |
1.04 |
2.6 |
| 4.5 |
3.33 |
1.17 |
2.9 |
| 5.0 |
3.70 |
1.30 |
3.3 |
| 5.5 |
4.07 |
1.43 |
3.6 |
| 6.0 |
4.44 |
1.56 |
3.9 |
|