|
>
Department >
Home >
Beef
>
Beef/Cattle
>
Reproduction
Beef/Cattle Extension Program
Optimizing Reproductive Performance
By Rick Funston, Extension Beef
Specialist, MSU and Tom Geary Reproductive Physiologist,
Fort Keogh
Rebreeding performance of the first calf heifer has
major economic consequences. This classification of
breeding animal is often the most challenging to manage
for reproductive efficiency, primarily because this
animal is not only subject to the stresses of calving
and lactation for the first time but she is also still
growing. Failure to rebreed after birth of the first
calf is one of the primary reasons for culling in a
beef cattle operation in the Western United States.
There is a considerable amount of money invested in
this animal and high replacement rates can greatly decrease
the profitability of a beef cattle operation.
Herd health
A sound herd health program is an essential part of
any reproductive management system. Cattle are susceptible
to a variety of diseases which are detrimental to reproduction.
All herd health programs should be implemented under
the supervision of a qualified, licensed veterinarian.
A relationship exists between poor nutrition and increased
incidence of herd health problems. Several vitamins
and minerals are necessary for immune system function
and nutrient deficiencies in these areas can result
in an increased susceptibility to disease.
Breed heifers to calve earlier than the cow
herd
Properly developed and managed beef heifers generally
have a 20-30 day longer postpartum interval (interval
from calving until fertile estrus) than older cows.
The practice of breeding virgin heifers 20-30 days earlier
than the cow herd will allow the heifer additional time
to return to estrus and rebreed with the older cows
the next year. It is important to manage these heifers
separately for two reasons; 1) earlier calving will
likely mean that pastures are not available as soon
and additional nutrients will need to be supplied, and
2) nutrient requirements (% of ration) are higher for
1st calf heifers than for mature cows. Breeding
heifers early will be of no benefit if they are not
properly managed after calving.
Minimize the postpartum interval
The period from calving until the cow conceives is
a very critical period in a cow's production cycle,
minimizing this time period is critical for maximizing
reproductive and economic efficiency of a beef cattle
operation. Cows that cycle early in the breeding season
have more opportunities to become pregnant during a
limited breeding season. Keeping other factors
constant such as genetics, age of dam and nutrition,
cows conceiving early in the breeding season will have
older calves that will have heavier weaning weights.
The length of breeding season will influence uniformity
of calves and their value at weaning. In order to have
a successful, short breeding season, it is vital that
cattle cycle and conceive early in the breeding season.
The ability to minimize the postpartum interval
is limited by uterine involution, which is the time
needed for repair of the reproductive tract so another
pregnancy can be established. Uterine involution generally
occurs within 30 days postpartum and does not generally
limit cyclicity; however, factors such as malnutrition,
disease and calving difficulty will delay normal involution.
Body Condition Score
Body condition is correlated with several reproductive
events such as postpartum interval, services per conception,
calving interval, milk production, weaning weight, calving
difficulty and calf survival and can greatly affect
net income on a cow/calf operation (Table 1; Kunkle
et al., 1994). Body condition at calving is the single
most important factor controlling when a beef heifer
will cycle after calving. Heifers should have an optimum
body condition of 5-6 at calving through breeding to
assure optimal reproductive performance. Body condition
score is generally a reflection of nutritional management,
however, disease and parasitism can contribute to lower
body condition scores even if apparent nutrient requirements
are met.
Nutritional Management
Feeding a balanced ration to heifers in the last trimester
of pregnancy through the breeding season is of critical
importance. Nutritional demands increase greatly
in late gestation and even more in early lactation.
Reproduction has low priority among partitioning of
nutrients and consequently, cows in thin body condition
often don't rebreed. Plane of nutrition the last 50-60
days prior to calving has a profound effect on postpartum
interval (Tables 2 and 3, Randel, 1990 and Bellows,
1995, respectively). The importance of pre- and
postpartum protein and energy level on reproductive
performance has been consistently demonstrated (Table
2). Positive energy balance postpartum is essential
for prompt rebreeding of heifers that calve in thin
condition (Table 4; Lalman et al., 1997). Recent
research (Bellows et al., 1999) conducted at the Livestock
and Range Research Laboratory at Miles City, MT has
demonstrated that fat from oil seed sources fed prepartum
to heifers, increased conception rates and tended to
increase calf weaning weights. Beef cattle do not have
a fat requirement per se, but it is possible that providing
this nutrient at times of high nutrient demand such
as pre- and/or postpartum may increase reproductive
efficiency.
Feeding a balanced ration the last trimester of pregnancy
will decrease calving difficulty. Heifers fed
diets deficient in energy or protein the last trimester
not only experience more calving difficulty, but breed
back later in the breeding season and have increased
sickness, death and lower weaning weights in their calves
(Table 3). Caution should be used
with feeding excessive amounts of nutrients before or
after calving. Not only is it costly, but animals with
excess body condition (>7) have lower reproductive
performance and more calving difficulty than animals
in moderate body condition (5-6). Overfeeding
protein during the breeding season and early gestation,
particularly if the rumen receives an inadequate supply
of energy may be associated with decreased fertility
(Elrod and Butler, 1993). This decrease in fertility
may result from decreased uterine pH during the luteal
phase of the estrous cycle in cattle fed high levels
of degradable protein. The combination of high levels
of degradable protein and low energy concentrations
in early-season grasses may contribute to lower fertility
rates in females placed on such pastures near the time
of breeding.
Calving difficulty and time of intervention
Bellows (1995) indicated that cows that experience
calving difficulty will take longer to cycle than cows
not experiencing calving difficulty, therefore, it is
important to minimize calving difficulty in your breeding
herd. Time of intervention, when obstetrical assistance
is needed, also affects cyclicity. Dams given early
assistance had a reduction in postpartum interval, a
higher percentage in heat by the beginning of the breeding
season, a trend toward fewer services per conception,
an increase in fall pregnancy rate and heavier calves
at weaning (Table 5). Therefore, early assistance,
when needed, is important to assure heifers return to
estrus as soon as possible.
Suckling stimulus from the calf has a negative effect
on cyclic activity during the postpartum period, however,
animals on a positive energy balance and in adequate
body condition generally overcome this negative stimulus
prior to the breeding season. Calf removal, either temporary
or permanent can increase the number of cows that return
to estrus during the breeding season (Williams, 1990).
A common practice in some synchronization programs is
48 hr calf removal which has been shown to induce cyclicity
in postpartum cows and first calf heifers. It is important
to provide a clean, dry pen with grass hay and water
and make sure mother and calf pairs up before going
to pasture.
Ionophores such as Bovatec7 and Rumensin7
have been shown to influence reproductive performance
during the postpartum period. Cows and heifers fed an
ionophore exhibit a shorter postpartum interval provided
adequate energy is supplied in the ration (Table 6;
Randel, 1990). This effect appears to be more evident
in less intensely managed herds that generally have
a moderate (60-85d) or longer postpartum interval.
Scientists have also demonstrated that heifers fed an
ionophore reach puberty at an earlier age and a lighter
weight.
Induction of estrus with hormones
Progestin containing products such as MGA (melengesterol
acetate) or Syncro-Mate B can shorten the postpartum
interval provided that nutrition and body condition
are adequate. Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)
is another hormone used in synchronization programs
which will induce estrus in some heifers. None of these
products are substitutes for good management and heifers
need to be at least 40 days postpartum before they will
induce cyclicity.
Bull presence from 30 days after calving to the start
of the breeding season has been shown to cause heifers
to cycle earlier. Bull exposure requires exposing heifers
to surgically altered bulls that are not capable of
breeding. Approximately one bull per twenty heifers
is required and limited data suggests exposure to androgenized
steers or cows will produce similar results.
Summary
- A sound herd health program is essential for optimum
reproductive efficiency.
- Breed heifers 20-30 days before the cow herd.
- Make sure heifers are on a balanced ration the last
trimester of pregnancy through the breeding season.
- Heifers should be in optimum body condition (5-6)
at calving and through the breeding season.
- Provide calving assistance in a timely manner when
needed.
- Use an ionophore for increased feed efficiency,
coccidiosis control and the positive affect on reproductive
performance.
- Progestins, GnRH, 48-hour calf removal and bull
exposure are management tools that can induce cyclicity
in some heifers.
There are several management practices that can assist
in shortening the postpartum interval but none of these
recommendations will take the place of good management.
Body condition, level of nutrition, age of cows, milk
production, weather, disease, parasites, and other factors
will affect the ability to shorten the postpartum interval.
The first place to address this problem is with proper
nutrition prior to calving and through the breeding
season and managing for optimum body condition.
Table 1. Relationship of body condition score (BCS)
to beef cow performance and income
|
BCS |
Pregnancy rate, % |
Calving interval, d |
Calf ADG, lb |
Calf WW, lb |
Calf Price, $/100 lb |
$/cow Exposeda |
|
3 |
43 |
414 |
1.60 |
374 |
96 |
154 |
|
4 |
61 |
381 |
1.75 |
460 |
86 |
241 |
|
5 |
86 |
364 |
1.85 |
514 |
81 |
358 |
|
6 |
93 |
364 |
1.85 |
514 |
81 |
387 |
a Income per calf x pregnancy rate.
Table 2. Effect of pre- or postpartum dietary energy
or protein on pregnancy rates in cows and heifers
| |
Adequate |
Inadequate |
| Nutrient and time |
Percent Pregnant |
| Energy level precalvinga |
73 |
60 |
| Energy level postcalvingb |
92 |
66 |
| Protein level precalvingc |
80 |
55 |
| Protein level postcalvingd |
90 |
69 |
abcd Combined data from 2, 4, 9 and 10 studies,
respectively.
Table 3. Effects of feed level during gestation
on calving and subsequent reproductiona
| |
Gestation diet of dam |
| Item |
Low |
Highb |
| Calf birth weight
(lbs) |
63 |
69 |
| Dystocia (%) |
35 |
28 |
| Calf Survival (%) |
|
|
|
At Birth |
93 |
91 |
|
Weaning |
58 |
85 |
| Scours (%) |
|
|
|
Incidence |
52 |
33 |
|
Mortality |
19 |
0 |
| Dam Traits |
|
|
|
Estrus (prior to breeding season (%)) |
48 |
69 |
|
Pregnancy (%) |
65 |
75 |
|
Precalving pelvic area (cm2) |
256 |
271 |
aAverages from seven studies
bDiet level fed from up to 150 days precalving;
low and high, animals lost or gained weight precalving,
respectively.
Table 4. Influence of postpartum
diet on weight change, condition score (CS) change and
postpartum interval (PPI)
| |
Diet |
| Item |
Low |
Maintenance |
Maint./ High |
High |
| Weight, lb |
835 |
822 |
826 |
821 |
| Condition Score |
4.27 |
4.26 |
4.18 |
4.10 |
| PPI, d |
134 |
120 |
115 |
114 |
| PPI Wt. Change,
lb |
12 |
40 |
70 |
77 |
| PPI CS Change
|
-.32 |
.37 |
1.24 |
1.50 |
Table 5. Effect of time of calving assistance
on dam breeding and calf performance
| |
Time of Assistance |
| Item |
Early |
Late |
| Postpartum interval,
(d) |
49 |
51 |
| In heat at beginning
of breeding season (%) |
91 |
82 |
| Services/conception |
1.15 |
1.24 |
| Fall pregnancy (%) |
92 |
78 |
| Calf average daily
gain (lb) |
1.74 |
1.63 |
| Calf weaning weight
(lb) |
422 |
387 |
Table 6. Effect of ionophore feeding on postpartum
interval (PPI) in beef cows and heifers
|
Study |
Ionophore (PPI, d) |
Control (PPI, d) |
Difference (d) |
|
1 |
30 |
42 |
12 |
|
2 |
59 |
69 |
10 |
|
3 |
67 |
72 |
5 |
|
4 |
65 |
86 |
21 |
|
5 |
92 |
138 |
46 |
References
Bellows, R.A., Simms, D.D., Grings, E.E., Phelps, D.A.,
Bellows, S.E., Bellows, N.R., Short, R.E., Funston,
R.N., and Geary, T.W. 1999. Effects of feeding
supplemental fat during gestation on reproduction in
primiparous beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 77 (Suppl. 1):
107.
Bellows, R.A. 1995. Managing the first-calf heifer.
In: Proc., International Beef Symposium. January 18-20.
Great Falls, MT. p 74-85.
Elrod, C.C., and W.R. Butler. 1993. Reduction of fertility
and alteration of uterine pH in heifers fed excess ruminally
degradable protein. J. Anim. Sci. 71:694-701.
Kunkle, W.E., R.S. Sands and D.O. Rae. 1994. Effect
of body condition on productivity in beef cattle.
M. Fields and R. Sands (Ed.) Factors Affecting Calf
Crop. Pp 167-178. CRC Press.
Lalman, D.L., D.H. Keisler, J.E. Williams, E.J. Scholljegerdes,
and D.M. Mallett. 1997. Influence of postpartum weight
and body condition change on duration of anestrus by
undernourished suckled beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2003-2008.
Randel, R.D. 1990. Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding
in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:853-862.
Selk, G.E., R.P. Wettemann, K.S. Lusby, and R.J. Rasby.
1986. The importance of body condition at calving on
reproduction in beef cows. OK Animal Sci. Res. Rept.
OK State Univ. MP-118.
Williams, G. L. 1990. Suckling as a regulator of postpartum
rebreeding in cattle: a review. J. Anim. Sci.
68:831-852.
|